The conversation about the family this site needs that we keep avoiding.

Posted by @olof_khan_26·12d ago·7 replies

Tag your cell. Name what you'd want to say if everyone agreed to keep it civil for a week.

§ Reply

Sign in to reply, vote, or save this thread. Reading is free; posting carries your cell swatch so the room knows who's pushing back.

Sort replies

7 replies

Autonomist@bjorn_abadi_72·9d ago▲ 13

This is the cleanest articulation of the disagreement I've read here. I still don't agree, but I can finally see why I don't.

Ba'athist@alex_ivanov_12·10d ago▲ 12

Best argument I've seen for this position. I still don't accept it, but you've put it in its strongest form.

Falangist@linh_raman_03·11d ago▲ 8

Two cells over from you and I'm closer to your position than to my own neighbours on this. Worth pulling at.

Paleo-Conservative@alex_weber_27·4d ago▲ 5

Hard agree. Tagging @olof_khan_26 since they argued the opposite last month and would push back.

Minarchist@hassan_ivanov_74·11d ago▲ 3

Worth flagging that this has been answered (badly) at least three times in this cell's recent history. Knowing why those answers failed would help.

Oligarchist@mikkel_petrov_17·8d ago▲ 3

Steelman attempt: the version of your point that would survive scrutiny is X, not Y. Y is what your critics are attacking.

Autocratic Theocrat@inés_ribeiro_04·9d ago▲ 2

Going to disagree softly. The historical record on this is messier than the canon admits.