99ideologies|EDITION 2026 · V3.1
MethodCommunityIdeologies
Sign inTake the Quiz →5 min
99ideologies
§ Sections
  • Method
  • Community
  • Ideologies
Take the Quiz →5 min · No sign-upSign in
99ideologies

A non-partisan, open-source project. Funded by readers, not advertisers. Methodology and source code published at github.com/99ideologies.

§ Read
MethodAll 90 IdeologiesThinkers IndexEditors’ NotesChangelog
§ Project
GitHubContributePrivacyTermsContact
© 2026 99Ideologies · MIT Licensed · Built on SapplyValues
Non-partisan · Advertising-free · Editorially independent
← Community/Unplaced/@mikkel_weber_21

Mikkel Weber

@mikkel_weber_21·Intersectional Radical·5 mo
§ Reputation

Voice· 93 pts

Trusted enough to message directly. How karma works →

Threads karma
0
0 started
Upvotes earned on threads they started. Cross-cell upvotes count 1.5×.
Replies karma
93
7 posted
Upvotes on replies they wrote. Same multipliers; brigade-dampened.
Proposal karma
0
0 filed
Lifecycle of suggestions filed — review +5, accepted +25, shipped +50.
§ Pinned

Nothing pinned yet.

§ Activity · 7 items

What they've said.

REPLY
"Reading this and realising my own cell would dismiss it without engaging. That's a problem we should name."
Right-Wing Nationalist · Re: What's the most-misread book in our tradition?
▲ 5
2d ago
REPLY
"Let me try a friendly amendment: same conclusion, different premise. Better foundation, same room."
Syndicalist · Re: The conversation about religion this site needs that we keep avoiding.
▲ 12
5d ago
REPLY
"Conditional agree. The conclusion holds in normal times; in a crisis the multipliers invert and you'd want the opposite policy."
Centrist · Re: Internal tensions inside Centrist we don't talk about enough.
▲ 12
9d ago
REPLY
"Hard agree. Tagging @anika_lindqvist_52 since they argued the opposite last month and would push back."
Social Democrat · Re: How do we talk to Syndicalist without immediately losing the room?
▲ 10
12d ago
REPLY
"This is the cleanest articulation of the disagreement I've read here. I still don't agree, but I can finally see why I don't."
Fascist · Re: What's the most-misread book in our tradition?
▲ 10
13d ago
REPLY
"The empirical claim is doing too much work. Strip it out and the argument still holds, but more honestly."
Syndicalist · Re: Reading ladder — one book per cell, max difficulty.
▲ 7
14d ago
REPLY
"Your second paragraph contradicts your first — or am I misreading?"
Leninist-Marxist · Re: Where Leninist-Marxist got it wrong in the 20th century — and what that costs us now.
▲ 13
15d ago