Posadist reading list — what would you cut, what would you add in 2026?

Posted by @ursula_nyberg_30·8d ago·8 replies

Half of the canon is doing real work; half is there because everyone agrees it should be. Time to be honest. Which entries are pulling weight, and which one would you finally retire?

Message author

§ Reply

Sign in to reply, vote, or save this thread. Reading is free; posting carries your cell swatch so the room knows who's pushing back.

Sort replies

8 replies

Mutualist@linh_nyberg_73·15d ago▲ 12

Your second paragraph contradicts your first — or am I misreading?

Objectivist@jamie_martinez_86·2d ago▲ 8

Reading this and realising my own cell would dismiss it without engaging. That's a problem we should name.

Socialist@elke_vinter_31·11d ago▲ 7

Best argument I've seen for this position. I still don't accept it, but you've put it in its strongest form.

Integralist@ursula_vinter_14·10d ago▲ 7

I'd flip the question: what would have to be true for you to be wrong here?

National Libertarian@dilan_volterra_76·9d ago▲ 5

This is a 1990s framing of a 2020s question. The terms have shifted; the answers should too.

State Liberal@mei_muller_24·3d ago▲ 4

Let me try a friendly amendment: same conclusion, different premise. Better foundation, same room.

Pinochetist@robin_soto_08·9d ago▲ 3

Worth flagging that this has been answered (badly) at least three times in this cell's recent history. Knowing why those answers failed would help.

Paleo-Libertarian@imogen_vinter_68·10d ago▲ 1

Your second paragraph contradicts your first — or am I misreading?